Voskarides, Konstantinos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3705-3451
Dweep, Harsh
Chrysostomou, Charalambos
Article History
Received: 12 March 2019
Accepted: 20 May 2019
First Online: 7 June 2019
Change Date: 2 July 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the original publication of this article [1], the Figure 1 and Figure 2 were wrong. The Figure 1 “<i>Heat map showing the quantity of DNA repair genes, from red to blue in ascending order, per species’ genome (numbers at the top of the figure represent the species code that is found in Table 1). Each DNA repair gene pathway was analyzed separately in rows. Radiated species’ genomes are richer in DNA repair genes. Analytical data can be found in Additional file 2: Table S2. M mammals, B&R birds and reptiles, BF bony fishes</i>” should be the picture of Figure 2. The figure 2 “<i>Linear regression analysis. The number of DNA repair genes is linearly related to genome size and protein number. As a negative control, we show that genome size is not linearly related with protein number</i>” should be the picture of figure 1.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Not applicable
: Not applicable
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.