Sköld, Martin
Rolstad, Sindre
Joas, Erik
Kardell, Mathias
Pålsson, Erik
Goodwin, Guy M.
Landén, Mikael https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-6451
Funding for this research was provided by:
Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna (SSv2019-0008)
Vetenskapsrådet (2018-02653)
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (KF10-0039)
Swedish Federal Government under the LUA/ALF agreement (ALFGBG-716801)
University of Gothenburg
Article History
Received: 14 January 2021
Accepted: 2 March 2021
First Online: 1 June 2021
Declarations
:
: The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013. The current study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Gothenburg, Sweden (Dnr 294–11). According to Swedish law, inclusion in Swedish quality registers follows an opt‐out procedure where patients are informed and may decline to participate, in which case data cannot be recorded. The requirement for informed consent is waived in register studies where analyses are conducted on an anonymized dataset.
: Not Applicable.
: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: MS has nothing to disclose. SR has nothing to disclose. EJ has nothing to disclose. MK has nothing to disclose. EP has nothing to disclose. GG reports personal fees from Servier, personal fees from Lundbeck, personal fees from Medscape, personal fees from P1Vital, personal fees from Compass pathways, personal fees from Johnson&Johnson/Janssen, personal fees from Sage Therapeutics, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. ML reports grants from The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, grants from The Swedish Medical Research council, grants from The Swedish Federal Government under the LUA/ALF agreement, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Lundbeck pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work.