Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
van Diemen, Tijn http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-4962
Craig, Ashley
van Nes, Ilse J. W.
,
van Laake, Charlotte
Bloemen, Jos
Stolwijk-Swuste, Janneke
Scholten, Eline
Faber, Willemijn
Boerrigter, Joke
Beurskens, Martine
Spijkerman, Dorien
Postma, Karin
Groenewegen, Esther
Snoek, Govert
Martens, Iris
van Nes, Ilse
van Diemen, Tijn
Roels, Ellen
Sprik, Joke
Stolwijk-Swuste, Janneke M.
Geertzen, Jan H. B.
Middleton, James
Post, Marcel W. M.
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
the Dutch Rehabilitation foundation (2014039)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 17 June 2020
Accepted: 28 September 2020
First Online: 19 October 2020
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: For the Dutch arm of the study: The Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Centre Utrecht declared that the study did not need formal ethical approval under the Dutch law regulating medical research in human beings (reference number: 15–449/C). After that, in accordance with local requirements, the Medical Ethics Committees of all participating Dutch rehabilitation centers approved the conduct of the study in their center.For the Australian arm: The Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Sydney Local Health District approved the project (reference number: LNR/17/HAWKE/269).The study, in both countries, was carried out in accordance with the code of conduct formulated in the Helsinki code. All participants provided written informed consent before entering the study.
: Not applicable.
: No conflict of interest is reported.
