Updates are available Correction dated 2022-03-24
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00317-6
-
Authors
Franklin, Kirsty A. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-9740
Norris, Ken
Gill, Jennifer A.
Ratcliffe, Norman
Bonnet-Lebrun, Anne-Sophie
Butler, Simon J.
Cole, Nik C.
Jones, Carl G.
Lisovski, Simeon
Ruhomaun, Kevin
Tatayah, Vikash
Nicoll, Malcolm A. C.
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/M012549/1, NE/H5081500)
British Ornithologists’ Union
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 14 January 2022
Accepted: 22 February 2022
First Online: 14 March 2022
Change Date: 24 March 2022
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00317-6
Declarations
:
: This work involved the tagging (rings and geolocators) and recapture of petrels. All work followed the ethical standards set out by The Mauritian Wildlife Foundation and its partner and consulting organizations, the North of England Zoological Society, the Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust and the International Zoo Vet Group. In addition, geolocator deployment and recovery were approved by the Zoological Society of London Animal Ethics Committee.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
