Updates are available Correction dated 2026-09-09
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-026-00971-9
-
Authors
Masood, Hassan
DeYoung, Veronica
Andrisani, Peter
Kodeeswaran, Arthane
Sparring, Taylor
Arora, Jaskirat
Savic, Natasha
Babulic, Jonathan L.
Matino, Davide
Liaw, Patricia C.
Kretz, Colin A.
Fox-Robichaud, Alison https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9912-3606
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
CIHR (CIHR)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 2 March 2026
Accepted: 12 June 2026
First Online: 24 June 2026
Change Date: 9 September 2026
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-026-00971-9
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.
Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Take-home message: This scoping review identifies substantial methodological variability across mouse models used to study von Willebrand factor (VWF) in inflammation, helping explain inconsistent and sometimes conflicting findings in the literature. By highlighting gaps in model selection, reporting practices, and outcome measurement, this review provides a framework to improve the translational relevance of future studies investigating VWF-mediated inflammatory processes.
140-character Tweet: Mouse models used to study VWF in inflammation vary widely, creating inconsistent findings. Our review maps these gaps to guide better, more translational research.
Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare.
