Crossmark

Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00348-5

Published Online: 2021-07-16

Published Print: 2021-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Nielsen, Helle Baungaard http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-8209
Schou, Søren

Bruun, Niels Henrik

Starch-Jensen, Thomas
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-07-16

Version of Record valid from 2021-07-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 12 January 2021

Accepted: 22 April 2021

First Online: 16 July 2021

Declarations

:

: Ethical approval was sought for the study from The North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (Approval No.: 20160047). All potential participants received verbal and written information about the study by the principal investigator (HBN). An informed consent was signed by all participants before enrollment.

: All authors are aware for publication of this work.

: Helle Baungaard Nielsen and Thomas Starch-Jensen have received implants and biomaterials for the present study and other studies assessing MSFA with different graft materials. However, none of Helle Baungaard Nielsen, Søren Schou, Niels Henrik Bruun, and Thomas Starch-Jensen have economical interest in the company or product related to this study or other studies.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below