Geiping, Lukas
Detlefsen, Henrik
Trittmacher, Sara
Baums, Christoph Georg
Bergmann, René
Hennig-Pauka, Isabel
Funding for this research was provided by:
Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover (TIHO)
Article History
Received: 28 August 2023
Accepted: 16 October 2023
First Online: 24 October 2023
Change Date: 27 February 2024
Change Type: Update
Change Details: Funding note was published incorrectly: Not applicable. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. It should be: Not applicable.
Declarations
:
: Except for the blood survival assay shown in Fig. 5, this case report does not include experimental data, and all further investigations were performed as routine diagnostics during the clinical outbreak. Therefore, seeking approval from the animal ethics committee was unnecessary. Sampling and treatment of animals was conducted by veterinarians. Collection of blood from non-infected piglets for the blood survival assay shown in Fig. 5 was in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the EU Directive 2010/63/EU, the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes and the German Animal Protection Law (Tierschutzgesetz). This was approved under the permit number A09/19 of the Landesdirektion Sachsen. The Animal Protection Committee of the Landesdirektion Sachsen (Ethics Committee) is involved in the process of approval of animal experiments by the Landesdirektion Sachsen as regulated by the German Animal Protection Law.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.