Crossmark

A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01230-w

Published Online: 2023-01-28

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Weir, Christopher J. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-4903
Adamestam, Imad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-3682
Sharp, Rona

Ennis, Holly

Heed, Andrew

Williams, Robin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-4611
Cresswell, Kathrin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9537
Dogar, Omara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-8403
Pontefract, Sarah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0344-4075
Coleman, Jamie

Lilford, Richard https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-984X
Watson, Neil

Slee, Ann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-7041
Chuter, Antony https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-5939
Beggs, Jillian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-3256
Slight, Sarah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-846X
Mason, James https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-4082
Yardley, Lucy

Sheikh, Aziz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Programme Grants for Applied Research (NIHR RP-PG-0617-20009)

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West

NIHR HPRU for Behavioural Science and Evaluation

National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2023-01-28

Version of Record valid from 2023-01-28
More Information

Article History

Received: 23 May 2022

Accepted: 16 December 2022

First Online: 28 January 2023

Declarations

:

: The qualitative and Fidelity Index research have been approved by the Health and Research Authority and the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (ref: 19/NS/0174). Arrangements for informed consent for the qualitative components of this research are described in the “Methods” section.The feasibility trial and quantitative analysis have been approved by the London South East Research Ethics Committee (ref: 22/LO/0204). Consent is not sought for eligible admissions in this service-level evaluation of intervention feasibility, but the intervention implementation pack contains a patient information leaflet to help clinical staff explain the process of antibiotic use and review to patients.

: Not applicable

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below