Campos, José Miguel
Sousa, Ana Catarina
Pinto, Pedro Olivério
Ribeiro, Jorge
França, Miguel Lacueva
Caseiro, Ana Rita
Branquinho, Mariana Vieira
Pedrosa, Sílvia Santos
Mendonça, Carla
Brandão, Ana
Santos, José Domingos
Afonso, Américo
Atayde, Luís Miguel
Luís, Ana Lúcia
Maurício, Ana Colette http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0018-9363
Article History
Received: 21 October 2018
Accepted: 7 December 2018
First Online: 29 December 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: All the animal testing procedures were in conformity with the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and the Portuguese DL 113/2013. All the procedures were approved by the ICBAS-UP Animal Welfare Organism of the Ethics Committee (ORBEA) and by the Veterinary Authorities of Portugal (DGAV). Humane end points were followed in accordance to the OECD Guidance Document on the Recognition, Assessment and Use of Clinical Signs as Humane Endpoints for Experimental Animals Used in Safety Evaluation (2000), and adequate measures were taken to minimize pain and discomfort considering human endpoints for animal suffering and distress. The interaction of Bonelike® in bone tissue was evaluated in 10 dogs and 4 cats.
: Not applicable.
: The authors report no financial or other conflicts relates to this report. The authors do not have conflict of interest with any of the materials or companies described in the manuscript. Although A Brandão is an employee of Biosckin, Molecular and Cell Therapies, S.A. this does not alter the adherence to policies on sharing data and materials.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.