Crossmark

Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in a retrospective full pregnancy history survey versus population-based prospective records: a validation study in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00472-5

Published Online: 2023-12-08

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Erchick, Daniel J.

Lama, Tsering P.

Subedi, Seema

Verhulst, Andrea

Guillot, Michel

Khatry, Subarna K.

LeClerq, Steven C.

Tielsch, James M.

Mullany, Luke C.

Katz, Joanne
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01, 1R01HD090082-01)

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1084399, OPP1084399, OPP1084399, OPP1084399, OPP1084399)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2023-12-08

Version of Record valid from 2023-12-08
More Information

Article History

Received: 23 June 2023

Accepted: 8 November 2023

First Online: 8 December 2023

Declarations

:

: The trial and the pregnancy history survey received ethical approval from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board, Baltimore, MD, USA. The trial received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal, and the pregnancy history survey received ethical approval from the Ethical Review Board of the Nepal Health Research Council (Kathmandu, Nepal).

: Not applicable.

: Patients or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below