Crossmark

Repeatedly measured predictors: a comparison of methods for prediction modeling

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-018-0024-7

Published Online: 2018-02-13

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Welten, Marieke https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4351-3757
de Kroon, Marlou L. A.

Renders, Carry M.

Steyerberg, Ewout W.

Raat, Hein

Twisk, Jos W. R.

Heymans, Martijn W.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

ZonMw (200500006)
More Information

Article History

Received: 25 September 2017

Accepted: 9 January 2018

First Online: 13 February 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.