Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Walton, Holly https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-059X
Crellin, Nadia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-5874
Litchfield, Ian https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1169-5392
Sherlaw-Johnson, Chris
Georghiou, Theo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-876X
Massou, Efthalia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-482X
Sidhu, Manbinder https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5663-107X
Tomini, Sonila M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4241-2121
Herlitz, Lauren https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-9041
Ellins, Jo
Ng, Pei Li https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-220X
Fulop, Naomi J. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5306-6140
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (16/138/17, 16/138/31)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 4 September 2024
Accepted: 14 February 2025
First Online: 3 March 2025
Declarations
:
: For this evaluation, the research was divided into two separate protocols. A protocol covering effectiveness, cost and staff elements received ethical approval from the University of Birmingham Humanities and Social Sciences ethics committee (ERN_13-1085AP39) and was categorised as a service evaluation by the HRA decision tool and UCL/UCLH Joint Research Office.The patient experience element (survey and case study interviews) was reviewed and given favourable opinion by the London-Bloomsbury Research ethics committee (REC reference: 21/HRA/0155). This patient experience study was categorised as an urgent public health study by NIHR.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.
