Crossmark

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure and post-mechanical ventilation

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-020-00036-9

Published Online: 2020-11-17

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Abo-Galala, Mona M. A.

Galal, Iman H. E.

Abdel-Fattah, Eman B. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-174X
Kamel, Basel B. M.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-11-17

Version of Record valid from 2020-11-17
More Information

Article History

Received: 9 July 2020

Accepted: 7 October 2020

First Online: 17 November 2020

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Informed written consent was taken from all patients (or their legal guardians) who were invited to participate in the research as regards confidentiality, right to refuse or withdraw, and in case of refusing to participate in the research, the patient will be followed up and will receive his treatment as planned. The study protocol and the written consent were revised and approved by the ethical committee of scientific research, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (committee’s reference number: MD 204/2015).

: Not applicable

: There are no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below