Crossmark

“Nothing is going to replace an in-person visit”: Canadian long-term care providers’ and recipients’ perspectives on when telehealth for physician visits is not appropriate

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-025-00219-8

Published Online: 2025-10-27

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Cole, Tyler R.

Crooks, Valorie A.

Sorensen, Janice

Jamal, Sherin

Mithani, Akber

Hung, Lillian

Snyder, Jeremy

Youngren, Catherine
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-10-27

Version of Record valid from 2025-10-27
More Information

Article History

Received: 18 July 2024

Accepted: 21 October 2025

First Online: 27 October 2025

Declarations

:

: Ethics approval was provided by the British of Columbia Harmonized Ethics Review process (protocol H22-02095) and informed consent was provided by all study participants. This approval was granted in accordance with Canada’s Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2), which adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below