Rispe, Claude
Hervet, Caroline
de la Cotte, Nathalie
Daveu, Romain
Labadie, Karine
Noel, Benjamin
Aury, Jean-Marc
Thany, Steeve
Taillebois, Emiliane
Cartereau, Alison
Le Mauff, Anaïs
Charvet, Claude L.
Auger, Clément
Courtot, Elise
Neveu, Cédric
Plantard, Olivier
Funding for this research was provided by:
INRAE
Institut Carnot France Futur Elevage (Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project, Xenobiotick project)
France Génomique (ANR-10-INBS-09-08, ANR-10-INBS-09-08, ANR-10-INBS-09-08, ANR-10-INBS-09-08, ANR-10-INBS-09-08)
Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives
Article History
Received: 17 February 2022
Accepted: 27 May 2022
First Online: 23 June 2022
Change Date: 12 July 2022
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08740-0
Declarations
:
: The source of feeding adult ticks was roe deers captured and released alive in the Forest of Chizé, following a protocol that complies with Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. All procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of Lyon 1 University (project DR2014–09, June 5, 2014). The capture of roe deer was carried out with minimal stress and pain to animals, which were released alive at the same site and on the same day of capture.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.