Crossmark

Assessment of research waste part 2: wrong study populations- an exemplar of baseline vitamin D status of participants in trials of vitamin D supplementation

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0555-1

Published Online: 2018-10-03

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Bolland, Mark J. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-2674
Grey, Andrew

Avenell, Alison
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-10-03
More Information

Article History

Received: 3 December 2017

Accepted: 10 September 2018

First Online: 3 October 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Not applicable.

: Not applicable.

: MB, AG, and AA have all published randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews in the fields of calcium and vitamin D but otherwise have no competing interests to declare.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below