Crossmark

A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6

Published Online: 2018-11-16

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Janssens, Karin A. M. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-3748
Bos, Elisabeth H.

Rosmalen, Judith G. M.

Wichers, Marieke C.

Riese, Harriëtte
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 23 May 2018

Accepted: 17 October 2018

First Online: 16 November 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Our study does not fall under the scope of the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) and thus no approval of the ethics committee and no informed consent had to be obtained according to our national regulation, see also guidelines of the Central Committee on research involving human subjects (ExternalRef removed).

: Our study does not fall under the scope of the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) and thus no informed consent had to be obtained according to our national regulation, see also guidelines of the Central Committee on research involving human subjects (ExternalRef removed). However, participants (all scientific researchers) were informed on forehand that their information would anonymously be used for scientific publication.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.