Crossmark

Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1

Published Online: 2019-05-16

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Jachno, Kim http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2550-9674
Heritier, Stephane

Wolfe, Rory
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1128222)

Australian Government RTP Stipend (APP843987)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-05-16

Version of Record valid from 2019-05-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 7 December 2018

Accepted: 7 May 2019

First Online: 16 May 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Not applicable.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below