Crossmark

How to measure the need for transition to adult services among young people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a comparison of surveillance versus case note review methods

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0820-y

Published Online: 2019-08-20

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Eke, Helen http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4781-6683
Janssens, Astrid

Downs, Johnny

Lynn, Richard M.

Ani, Cornelius

Ford, Tamsin
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-08-20

Version of Record valid from 2019-08-20
More Information

Article History

Received: 29 August 2018

Accepted: 13 August 2019

First Online: 20 August 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Relevant ethical approval was obtained. This type of surveillance required Health Research Authority (HRA) approval as cases may be reported from any NHS Trust that works with children across the UK. In addition, Section 251 approval is required from the Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) to permit clinicians to report anonymous case note information without patient/parent consent provided there is no requirement or expectation for additional patient contact as a result of the study.Health Research Authority (HRA) approval – HRA-IRAS reference 159209 Section 251 Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) – CAG reference 15/CAG/0184.CRIS was approved as an anonymised data resource for secondary analysis by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee (08/H0606/71 + 5). This project was reviewed and approved by the CRIS patient-led oversight committee (CRIS project ref.:961).

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below