Funding for this research was provided by:
The Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare
The Foundation for Quality and Informatics
The Danish Research Foundation for General Practice
Article History
Received: 17 October 2018
Accepted: 16 January 2019
First Online: 31 January 2019
Authors’ information
: All three authors hold a PhD degree, are social scientists in public health, sociology, and political science (respectively) and have several years of experience in qualitative health services research. At the time of this study, TDD was a post-doctoral researcher and TT and MBK were senior researchers.
: According to Danish law (LBK nr 1083) a qualitative study like this does not require ethical approval by the research ethics committee or written consent by the participants. The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (2016-41-4579) and recommended to general practitioners by the Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice (MPU 27–2016).
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The study was funded by several third parties (see funding below).
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.