Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Fadl, Helena http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2691-7525
Saeedi, Maryam
Montgomery, Scott
Magnuson, Anders
Schwarcz, Erik
Berntorp, Kerstin
Sengpiel, Verena
Storck-Lindholm, Elisabeth
Strevens, Helena
Wikström, Anna-Karin
Brismar-Wendel, Sophia
Persson, Martina
Jansson, Stefan
Ahlsson, Fredrik
Ursing, Carina
Ryen, Linda
Petersson, Kerstin
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
Hildén, Karin
Simmons, David
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Vetenskapsrådet (2018-00470)
Fru Mary von Sydows (107)
Fru Mary von Sydow (4917, 2618)
ALFGBG (823211)
Nyckelfonden (OLL-597601)
Region Örebro län (OLL-693551, OLL-786911)
Regional Research Committee Uppsala-Örebro (RFR-749241)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 19 July 2019
Accepted: 9 October 2019
First Online: 1 November 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The study evaluates existing clinical routine vs a new routine at each clinic involved. During pregnancy and when attending maternal health care women are informed about existing quality and health registers and have the possibility to opt out if they want to. The possibility to always decline care exists; there is no ethical concerns regarding treatment options or that someone would be treated differently than the existing routines at each centre. All data that are collected will be coded and results published on group level. Women always have the right under Swedish Law to change clinic and refuse any aspect of care. The study is approved by the Uppsala–Örebro regional Ethical Review board, Id number: 2016/487.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
