Funding for this research was provided by:
Saudi Arabia Cultural Bureau in London (NA)
Received: 24 June 2020
Accepted: 2 June 2021
First Online: 23 July 2021
: The Scientific Officer, West of Scotland Research Ethics Service reviewed the study and advised that it was considered a service evaluation that did not require formal research ethics consideration or approval. This view was endorsed by the University of Strathclyde Ethics Committee. Study design data management was approved by the local NHS Caldicott Guardian and was fully compliant with local and national clinical/data governance policies. The need for consent was deemed unnecessary according to the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences Ethics Approval committee [Reference # 0001.2016].
: Not required.
: The authors report no competing interest.