Funding for this research was provided by:
Cancer Council Victoria
Department of Health, Australian Government
Cancer Institute New South Wales
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions
Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Affairs
Swedish Social Ministry
Department of Health/National Cancer Action Team
Northern Ireland Public Health Agency, Tenovus and Welsh Government
Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-04-02
Received: 15 March 2016
Accepted: 21 March 2018
First Online: 2 April 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines in each participating jurisdiction. Commonly, no ethical approval was required, since the study was based on survey data. Wherever appropriate, reference numbers are stated: Australia: New South Wales Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee, Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria’s Human Research Ethics Committee (#0018); Canada: Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary (E-23667); Denmark: Danish Data Protection Agency (2011–41-6237); Norway: Norway Social Science Data Services (#27427); Sweden: Regionale etikprövningsämnden i Stockholm (2011/699–31/2); UK: University College London Research Ethics Committee for the Queen’s University School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Science, Cardiff University School of Medicine (1122/003). Written informed consent was not obtained from the participants as the interviews could not be performed with permission from the interviewees.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.