Funding for this research was provided by:
Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/PR-14705/BRB/10/898/2010)
Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-04-11
Received: 2 August 2017
Accepted: 25 March 2019
First Online: 11 April 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The study was approved (Bioethics Reference # MD-1) by Institutional Ethics Committee, National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The need for informed consent was waived by Institutional Ethics Committee, National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India, based on waiver of consent policy (page 23) of Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants, ICMR, 2006 (ExternalRef removed). Cell lines used in this study, did not require ethical approval.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.