Crossmark

The effectiveness of high-intensity CBT and counselling alone and following low-intensity CBT: a reanalysis of the 2nd UK National Audit of Psychological Therapies data

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1899-0

Published Online: 2018-10-03

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Barkham, Michael http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-6376
Saxon, David
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-10-03
More Information

Article History

Received: 14 June 2018

Accepted: 19 September 2018

First Online: 3 October 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Access to the data was given via request HQIP054 to the Health Quality Improvement Partnership and ethical approval for the secondary analysis of the audit data was given by the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) Ethics Committee, University of Sheffield.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below