Tibubos, Ana N.
Otten, Daniëlle
Zöller, Daniela
Binder, Harald
Wild, Philipp S.
Fleischer, Toni
Johar, Hamimatunnisa
Atasoy, Seryan
Schulze, Lara
Ladwig, Karl-Heinz
Schomerus, Georg
Linkohr, Birgit
Grabe, Hans J.
Kruse, Johannes
Schmidt, Carsten-Oliver
Münzel, Thomas
König, Jochem
Brähler, Elmar
Beutel, Manfred E.
Funding for this research was provided by:
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Article History
Received: 7 December 2020
Accepted: 12 April 2021
First Online: 5 May 2021
Change Date: 29 October 2021
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The funding note was missing in the original publication. The article has been updated to rectify the error.
Declarations
:
: All three cohort studies included in the GESA consortium were approved by ethic committees.GHS: The GHS and its procedure were approved by the ethics committee of the Statutory Board of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (approval at 22.3.2007, latest update 20.10.2015, reference no. 837.020.07). Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained from each subject upon entry into the study.KORA: All study methods were approved by the ethics committee of the Bavarian Chamber of Physicians, Munich (F4 and FF4: reference no. 06068).SHIP: This institutional ethics committee of the University Medicine Greifswald evaluated the study, design and instruments and testified its compliance with ethical requirements (reference no. BB 39/08).
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.