Farnbach, Sara http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-1079
,
Gee, Graham
Eades, Anne-Marie
Evans, John Robert
Fernando, Jamie
Hammond, Belinda
Simms, Matty
DeMasi, Karrina
Glozier, Nick
Brown, Alex
Hackett, Maree L.
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP101767)
University of Sydney (Cross Cultural Public Health Research Award)
George Institute for Global Health (John Chalmers Program Grant Scholarship)
National Heart Foundation (Future Leader Fellowship 10034)
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1056434)
National Health and Medical Research Council (Career Development Fellowship, Level 2, APP1141328)
University of New South Wales (Scientia Fellowship (2018-2021))
Article History
Received: 26 April 2019
Accepted: 29 August 2019
First Online: 18 September 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: This process evaluation was approved by the following committees: Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of NSW [1044/14], The University of Sydney [2014/361], Menzies School of Health Research [2014–2289], Metro South Health [14/QPAH/503], Western Australia Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee [607], Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee [15–287], ACT Health Human Research Ethics Committee [8.14.207], and Aboriginal Health Council of Australia [04/17/705]. All participants in the Getting it Right study and process evaluation completed written or verbal consent. The verbal consent process was established to accommodate participants with low literacy or for whom English was not their primary language. The verbal consent process required an independent person to be present during the reading aloud of the participant information sheet to the potential participant, and questions being asked and answered, during decisions whether to take part and when providing consent, if they chose to consent. This process was approved by all ethics committees.
: Not Applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.