Crossmark

Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4

Published Online: 2023-01-20

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Howell-Jones, Rebecca

Gold, Natalie

Bowen, Sarah

Bunten, Amanda

Tan, Karen

Saei, Ayoub

Jones, Sarah

MacDonald, Pauline

Watson, Robin

Bennett, Kirsty F.

Chadborn, Tim
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2023-01-20

Version of Record valid from 2023-01-20
More Information

Article History

Received: 10 September 2021

Accepted: 25 October 2022

First Online: 20 January 2023

Declarations

:

: Study 1: Ethical approval: Health Research Authority, REC reference16/WS/0181.Study 2: Ethical approval: PHE Research Ethics and Governance Group, Reference number R&D 281.All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. CONSORT reporting guidelines were followed (see the Supplementary Materials).Informed consent was obtained from the participating CCG’s within study 1. For study 2, informed consent was obtained from the participating childhood flu school vaccination providers.Study 2 was discussed with the PHE ethics committee who have stated that total informed consent from parents of the school children was not required due to the following reasons:OrderedList removed

: Not Applicable.

: There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below