Crossmark

Comparing physical activity prescription with verbal advice for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors: results from the PEPPER randomised controlled trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16302-6

Published Online: 2023-07-20

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Bellanger, William

Peurois, Matthieu

Connan, Laurent

Navasiolava, Nastassia

Missud, David

Py, Thibaut

Bègue, Cyril
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2023-07-20

Version of Record valid from 2023-07-20
More Information

Article History

Received: 4 October 2021

Accepted: 12 July 2023

First Online: 20 July 2023

Declarations

:

: All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and all participants provided informed consent. The protocol, information letter and informed consent certificate were approved by the Angers ethics committee and the French Health Products Safety Agency (study number 2014-A00332-45The French Data Protection Agency authorised the collection of identifying data (CCTIRS/CNIL approval number 14.559). The PEPPER trial is registered in the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry under number NCT02317003 (15/12/2014). The study was designed and reported in accordance with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial) statement [CitationRef removed].

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below