Crossmark

Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18934-8

Published Online: 2024-05-27

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Schmidt, Bey-Marrié

Mabetha, D.

Chibuzor, M.

Kunje, G.

Arikpo, D.

Aquaisua, E.

Lakudzala, S.

Mbeye, N.

Effa, E.

Cooper, S.

Kredo, T.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union (RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA, RIA2020S-3303-GELA)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2024-05-27

Version of Record valid from 2024-05-27
More Information

Article History

Received: 22 November 2023

Accepted: 23 May 2024

First Online: 27 May 2024

Declarations

:

: Ethics approval was granted by the South African Medical Research Council Human Research Ethics Committee (EC015-7/2022); The College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee, Malawi (P.07/22/3687); and the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (01/01/2007). Written and/or informed consent was sought from each participant and participants were included as authors.

: Not applicable.

: All authors declared no conflicting interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below