Holzmann-Littig, Christopher
Zerban, Nina L.
Storm, Clara
Ulhaas, Lilian
Pfeiffer, Mona
Kotz, Alexander
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Keil, Stephanie
Huber, Johanna
Article History
Received: 5 January 2022
Accepted: 20 May 2022
First Online: 10 June 2022
Declarations
:
: The ethics committee of each study site approved the conduct of the study or waived further review. The ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich (No. 31/21 S) and the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (No. 20-1151, approving for the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich and for the University of Augsburg), approved the study methods. The ethics committee of the University of Regensburg and the ethics committee of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg waived further review as the project had been approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München before. The ethics committee of the University of Würzburg waived further review and also referred to the vote of the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität of Munich, stating that in principle there are no objections to the implementation of such projects. All Methods were caried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from participants at the beginning of the questionnaire.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.