Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute for Health Research (Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Bursary. RDS Number 1976)
Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-06-07
Received: 20 August 2017
Accepted: 22 May 2018
First Online: 7 June 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: This was undertaken as a quality improvement project rather than a research project. Patients and healthcare staff participated as members of the public who volunteered to take part when notified of the project. Therefore by taking part they provided implied consent. Ethical approval was therefore not required and the project did not involve holding confidential and participant identifiable data. Under the UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research and the University of Birmingham's Code of Practice for Research, only research projects are required to undergo ethics review. This paper reports the outcome of a consultation exercise, which is not considered to be research for the purposes of ethics review under these policy frameworks.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.