Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-08
Received: 11 June 2018
Accepted: 15 October 2018
First Online: 8 November 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of School of Pharmacy at the College of Medicine and Health Sciences. The committee allowed seeking oral consent in the data collection considering the study was not deemed to pose risk to participants. In addition, the approval took into consideration participants would be of different educational levels. This was expected to be better accommodated through oral consent. In the conduct of data collection, participants of the study were asked for their oral consent after the purpose of the study was fully explained to them. The response of each potential participant to this question was recorded on the data collection instrument. The decision of potential respondents to not participate or discontinue an interview encounter was respected. After data collection, the analysis of the data was done on aggregate, with no individual level data described.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.