Sather, Eva Walderhaug
Iversen, Valentina Cabral
Svindseth, Marit Folsvik
Crawford, Paul
Vasset, Frøydis
Funding for this research was provided by:
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Article History
Received: 27 May 2022
Accepted: 21 November 2022
First Online: 30 December 2022
Declarations
:
: This scoping review article don’t have to be approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (with a NSD project number) or with no additional approval required for ethical clearance with The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) approval. All phases of the study were conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration and ethical principles in research. The authors declare no competing interests.<i>At Risk Mental State</i> (ARMS) construct was introduced two decades ago, in 1999, to allow identification of subjects at clinical high-risk for psychosis before full symptoms manifest [CitationRef removed].Assessment questions on qualitative research designs:1:Was there a clear statement of the research; 2: Is a qualitative methodology appropriate; 3: Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research; 4: Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research;5: Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue; 6: Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered; 7: Have ethical issues been taken into consideration; 8: Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous; 9: Is there a clear statement of findings; 10: How valuable is the research?Quality questions on quantitative research designs:1: Did the study ask a clearly focused question? 2: Was this a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and was it appropriately so? 3: Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups? 4: Were participants, staff and study personnel ‘blind’ to participants’ study group? 5: Were all the participants who entered the trial accounted for at its conclusion? 6: W<b>ere</b> the participants in all groups followed up and data collected in the same way? 7: Did the study have enough participants to minimize the play of chance? 8: How are the results presented and what is the main result and.9: How precise are these results? 10: Were all important outcomes considered so the results can be applied?Yes: score 1.No: score of 0.Can’t tell score of 3.
: (not applicable).
: (not applicable).