Morris, Katrina M. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8189-9844
Hindle, Matthew M.
Boitard, Simon
Burt, David W.
Danner, Angela F.
Eory, Lel
Forrest, Heather L.
Gourichon, David
Gros, Jerome
Hillier, LaDeana W.
Jaffredo, Thierry
Khoury, Hanane
Lansford, Rusty
Leterrier, Christine
Loudon, Andrew
Mason, Andrew S.
Meddle, Simone L.
Minvielle, Francis
Minx, Patrick
Pitel, Frédérique
Seiler, J. Patrick
Shimmura, Tsuyoshi
Tomlinson, Chad
Vignal, Alain
Webster, Robert G.
Yoshimura, Takashi
Warren, Wesley C.
Smith, Jacqueline
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN266200700005C, HHSN272201400006C)
ALSAC (N/A)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N015347/1)
Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0030/2015)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐009‐GENM‐008)
ITAVI (N/A)
National Health and Medical Research Council (N/A)
INRA (N/A)
Article History
Received: 7 June 2019
Accepted: 24 January 2020
First Online: 12 February 2020
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: ConsDD, HSR and LSR animals were bred at INRAE, UE1295 Pôle d’Expérimentation Avicole de Tours, F-37380 Nouzilly, in accordance with the European Union Guidelines for animal care, following the Council Directives 98/58/EC and 86/609/EEC. Animals were maintained under standard breeding conditions and subjected to minimal disturbance. Furthermore, the ethics committee approved the rearing protocol (authorization number 00915.02). The use of quail in photoperiod experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of Nagoya University. All experiments involving animals in the infection studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and performed in compliance with relevant policies of the National Institutes of Health and the Animal Welfare Act.
: Not applicable
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.