Crossmark

Comparison of individual, group and environmental sampling strategies to conduct influenza surveillance in pigs

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1805-0

Published Online: 2019-02-14

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Garrido-Mantilla, Jorge

Alvarez, Julio

Culhane, Marie

Nirmala, Jayaveeramuthu

Cano, Jean Paul

Torremorell, Montserrat http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-6537
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-02-14
More Information

Article History

Received: 1 August 2018

Accepted: 4 February 2019

First Online: 14 February 2019

Ethics approval

: This study was developed following the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee from University of Minnesota under protocol number 1510-33054A. The animals were owned by producers who had provided written consent to have samples collected from the animals.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.