Crossmark

Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5

Published Print: 2021-03

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

Kido, Tomoyuki https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-8623
Hirai, Kuniaki

Ogawa, Ryo

Tanabe, Yuki

Nakamura, Masashi

Kawaguchi, Naoto

Kurata, Akira

Watanabe, Kouki

Schmidt, Michaela

Forman, Christoph

Mochizuki, Teruhito

Kido, Teruhito
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-03-01

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-03-01

Version of Record valid from 2021-02-22
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

Journal Title: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5

Content Type: article

Copyright: Copyright © 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below