Goldberg, Eileen
Conte, Kathleen
Loblay, Victoria
Groen, Sisse
Persson, Lina
Innes-Hughes, Christine
Mitchell, Jo
Milat, Andrew
Williams, Mandy
Green, Amanda
Hawe, Penelope http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-867X
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT9100001)
Article History
Received: 1 April 2021
Accepted: 21 December 2021
First Online: 15 January 2022
Declarations
:
: Research ethics approval has been granted by the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (X16-0156) and by the research governance offices of each of the LHDs.
: Not applicable.
: There are no financial competing interests. There are no non-financial competing interests. In terms of research positionality, NSW Health is one of five funding partners of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre which funded the study. At the time of the study AM, LP, JM, CI-H, MW and AG were employees of NSW Health with direct roles in supporting and monitoring the HCI and/or designing and overseeing the use of PHIMS. At the time of the study EG, KC, VL, SG, and PH were university-based researchers funded through the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre. The anonymity of research participants was maintained throughout. That is, no authors other than the ethnographers had knowledge of the identity of sources for quotes and observations.