Sganzerla, Daniel
Teixeira, Cassiano
Robinson, Caroline Cabral
Kochhann, Renata
Santos, Mariana Martins Siqueira
de Moura, Rafaela Moraes
Barbosa, Mirceli Goulart
da Silva, Daiana Barbosa
Ribeiro, Tarissa
Eugênio, Cláudia
Schneider, Daniel
Mariani, Débora
Jeffman, Rodrigo Wiltgen
Bozza, Fernando
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi
Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes
Machado, Flávia Ribeiro
Salluh, Jorge Ibrain
Pellegrini, José Augusto Santos
Moraes, Rafael Barberena
Damiani, Lucas Petri
da Silva, Nilton Brandão
Falavigna, Maicon
Rosa, Regis Goulart
Funding for this research was provided by:
Ministério da Saúde
Article History
Received: 29 May 2018
Accepted: 20 October 2018
First Online: 19 November 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: This study will be conducted according to Resolution No. 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council (ExternalRef removed). The present study protocol version (version 3, from 22 February 2017) has been approved by the research ethics committee of the coordinating site (approval No. CAAE 57717516.3.1001.5330) and the research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The need for patients’ written informed consent was waived in 37 of 40 participating ICUs, because the standard of care encompasses both study interventions. In 3 of 40 ICUs informed consent will be required for patients or proxies. Informed consent will be required for family members and ICU professionals in all ICUs.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.