Weir, Christopher J. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-4903
Adamestam, Imad http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-3682
Sharp, Rona
Ennis, Holly
Heed, Andrew
Williams, Robin http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-4611
Cresswell, Kathrin http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9537
Dogar, Omara http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-8403
Pontefract, Sarah http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0344-4075
Coleman, Jamie
Lilford, Richard http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-984X
Watson, Neil
Slee, Ann http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-7041
Chuter, Antony http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-5939
Beggs, Jillian http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-3256
Slight, Sarah http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-846X
Mason, James http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-4082
Yardley, Lucy
Sheikh, Aziz http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056
Funding for this research was provided by:
Programme Grants for Applied Research (NIHR RP-PG-0617-20009)
NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West
NIHR HPRU for Behavioural Science and Evaluation
National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre
Article History
Received: 23 May 2022
Accepted: 16 December 2022
First Online: 28 January 2023
Declarations
:
: The qualitative and Fidelity Index research have been approved by the Health and Research Authority and the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (ref: 19/NS/0174). Arrangements for informed consent for the qualitative components of this research are described in the “Methods” section.The feasibility trial and quantitative analysis have been approved by the London South East Research Ethics Committee (ref: 22/LO/0204). Consent is not sought for eligible admissions in this service-level evaluation of intervention feasibility, but the intervention implementation pack contains a patient information leaflet to help clinical staff explain the process of antibiotic use and review to patients.
: Not applicable
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.