Funding for this research was provided by:
Green Templeton College, University of Oxford (small grant, Sheila Kitzinger Programme grant)
Received: 9 December 2017
Accepted: 26 June 2018
First Online: 17 September 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: This was a patient and public involvement project, gathering views from people with an interest in FGM to inform priority setting in research and co-design a research agenda. Our university institutional ethics guidance states that people who are “giving their views on research….do not count as “human participants” in the sense intended by CUREC’s [Central University Research Ethics Committee] policy. They are not giving you information about themselves, and the opinions they offer are not themselves the subject of research. You need not get ethical approval of your research if your contact with people is confined to this sort of interaction”. ExternalRef removed (FAQ A6).All participants freely chose to participate in these events to contribute to the development of a research agenda in this area.
: Not applicable
: Sharon Dixon is a trustee of Oxford Against Cutting, Brenda Kelly is a patron of Oxford Against Cutting.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.