Crossmark

Policy driven changes in animal research practices: mapping researchers’ attitudes towards animal-free innovations using the Netherlands as an example

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0067-5

Published Online: 2019-04-23

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Bressers, S.

van den Elzen, H.

Gräwe, C.

van den Oetelaar, D.

Postma, P. H. A.

Schoustra, S. K. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-8156
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-04-23
More Information

Article History

Received: 15 October 2018

Accepted: 18 March 2019

First Online: 23 April 2019

Authors’ information

: Not applicable.

: Data management, security, and integrity of the survey was approved by the Social Sciences Ethics Committee at Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands (registration number: ECSW2017–3001-466), and was endorsed by rector Prof. Han van Krieken, license holder for animal research at Radboud University and Radboudumc.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below