Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Ren, Xiaofeng https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-2058
Wang, Huimin https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6574-5156
Lv, Xiaoman https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5779-0237
Zhou, Yi
Fan, Yingyin
Yu, Yanjun
Turck, Christoph W.
Chen, Yuhui
Lv, Longbao
Hu, Yingzhou https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-7607
Li, Hao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-8719
Wang, Wenchao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-8660
Qin, Dongdong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-8408
Feng, Xiaoli https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8523-290X
Hu, Xintian https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1216-4806
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 6 June 2024
Accepted: 25 September 2024
First Online: 16 December 2024
Compliance with ethics guidelines
: Xiaofeng REN, Huimin WANG, Xiaoman LV, Yi ZHOU, Yingyin FAN, Yanjun YU, Christoph W. TURCK, Yuhui CHEN, Longbao LV, Yingzhou HU, Hao LI, Wenchao WANG, Dongdong QIN, Xiaoli FENG, and Xintian HU declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: All animal welfare and experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. IACUC-PE-2023-12-006). All monkeys were also handled in accordance with the National Institute of Health (USA) Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All animals had free access to clean water and were fed monkey chow supplemented with seasonal fresh fruit and vegetables twice a day. There were swings, ladders, branches, and mirrors for enriching living habitats within each social cage. Visual and auditory stimuli were offered daily through television programs and music display for sensory enrichment of single-caged monkeys.
