A “Goldilocks zone” for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement
Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01766-4
Published Online: 2022-04-05
Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy
Welhaf, Matthew S.
Meier, Matt E.
Smeekens, Bridget A.
Silvia, Paul J.
Kwapil, Thomas R.
Kane, Michael J.
Text and Data Mining valid from 2022-04-05
Version of Record valid from 2022-04-05
Article History
Accepted: 3 December 2021
First Online: 5 April 2022
Free to read: This content has been made available to all.