Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Pfefferle, Dana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-0360
Talbot, Steven R. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9062-4065
Kahnau, Pia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-8624
Cassidy, Lauren C. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-0284
Brockhausen, Ralf R. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0004-7840
Jaap, Anne https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-3486
Deikun, Veronika
Yurt, Pinar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6606-3811
Gail, Alexander https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1165-4646
Treue, Stefan https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8938-5810
Lewejohann, Lars https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0202-4351
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GA 1475/6-1/2, LE2356/5-1, PF 659/5-2, TA 2072/1-1, TR 447/5-1/2)
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Accepted: 21 March 2025
First Online: 6 June 2025
Declarations
:
: All animal studies were conducted according to the relevant national and international laws and guidelines, including the German Animal Protection Law, the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU on the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes, and the Society for Neuroscience Policies on the Use of Animals and Humans in Neuroscience Research. All animal procedures conducted with rhesus macaques at the German Primate Center have been approved by the responsible regional government office (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, LAVES, in Oldenburg) under permit number 33.19–42502 - 04–18/2823. Following this study, the monkeys remained in the laboratory to be enrolled in different experiments. Animal studies conducted with mice were approved by the responsible regional government office (LAGeSo, Berlin) under permit number G0182/17. The experiments (questionnaire and preference test) with humans were conducted using an online tool. All participants understood that their participation was voluntary, confidential, and anonymous. There were no technical means, nor were there any intentions, to assign saved data to individual participants. All participants in the human study agreed to the anonymous use of their data for publication. At the time and place of data collection for the human study, specific approval by an ethics board was neither mandatory nor common practice.
: All participants in the human study understood that their participation was voluntary, confidential, and anonymous. There were no technical means, nor were there any intentions, to assign saved data to individual participants. This publication includes only data from participants that agreed to these conditions.
: All participants in the human study agreed to the anonymous use of their data for publication.
: The authors declare that the study was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
